Editorial Advisory Board Q&A: Public or Private?

0

The current four GNSS and the two regional systems have been built and are operated by government agencies. Many correctional services and complementary FCM services are operated by private companies.

In the future, what do you think will be the division of labor between the public and private sectors in building and maintaining the capacities of the NTP? What should it be?


Ellen hall

“The space race has been championed by governments. Space travel, communications and other technologies were born out of space exploration by the government. Today we see many private companies engaged in space. Several intend to supplement GNSS navigation, and some plan to compete. Private companies have a ways to go if they plan to compete with systems like GPS, but competition is often at the center of innovation and can benefit everyone.
– Ellen Hall
Federal systems Spirent


Jules McNeff

Jules McNeff

“GNSS and regional systems are established and maintained to meet the needs of governments and the public agencies that operate them. They cover large areas and provide services to extremely diverse user communities at performance levels based on resources justified by user needs and limited by technical accessibility. When global / regional service levels do not meet the needs of a particular user group or require backup for security, the possibility is open for other agencies or private companies to create augmentations and additions to meet to additional needs. The mix is ​​variable and will be determined by user groups and the market.
– Jules McNeff
Overlook Systems Technologies


F. Michael Swiek

F. Michael Swiek

“There really is no single ‘correct’ answer or specific division of labor between public and private sector entities in GNSS. The situation we see today is the result of decades of constructive and successful ad hoc evolution of roles among and between public and private sector entities. Public agencies are better placed to provide basic technologies and infrastructure because of the high costs and long lead times associated with establishing constellations and maintaining a stable and consistent service. The private sector is better positioned to provide variety and flexibility in the development of innovative solutions for the wide range of ever-changing user needs in all market segments. This unofficial and ever-changing division of labor has functioned successfully and continues to adapt to the evolving world of FCM.
—Michael Swiek
GPS Alliance


Source link

Share.

Leave A Reply